Padsplit vs STR in a multi-unit Asset

Executive Summary

This case study evaluates the financial performance of a multi-unit property composed of 5 studios that operated under two distinct models: a mixed PadSplit and Airbnb strategy (non-FIBI operations), and an optimized short-term rental (STR) model managed by FIBI Vacation Rentals. The analysis spans from December 1, 2022, through July 31, 2025. The findings demonstrate that FIBI Vacation Rentals delivered a 26% increase in Net Operating Income (NOI) compared to prior operations.

  • Non-FIBI NOI (average): $3,948.90/month
  • FIBI NOI (average): $5,137/month
  • Performance Advantage: +30%

Through a $5,000 budget dedicated to unit design, amenities, and outdoor space upgrades, FIBI optimized occupancy and operational efficiency, achieving superior revenue and NOI outcomes.

Background

Property Overview

The subject property is a small multi-unit building located a few blocks off Las Vegas Blvd. Purchased in mid-2022 and converted from an office building into 5 studio units, the new owners initially pursued a hybrid strategy, filling units via both PadSplit tenants and Airbnb guests. This strategy began hosting tenants and guests, and generating revenues in December 2022 and was the primary strategy through January 2024.

In February 2024, FIBI Vacation Rentals assumed management, transitioning the property to an STR-only model with a focus on maximizing revenue per unit, improving guest experience, and streamlining operating expenses.

Methodology

The data for this study is derived from the attached workbook: Profit and Cash Flow Analysis. Key rows of the spreadsheet capture financial details:

  • Row 2: Months covered (Dec 2022 – Jul 2025)
  • Row 3: Income under non-FIBI operations
  • Row 4: Income under FIBI operations (after disbursement deductions)
  • Row 5: Special reimbursements (e.g., energy credits)
  • Row 6: Operating expenses (utilities, trash, internet, etc.)
  • Row 7: Net Operating Income (NOI)
  • Row 8–9: NOI allocations between FIBI and non-FIBI models
  • Row 18–25: Cash flow analysis (including capital expenditures, reimbursements, lawsuits, and other special events)

Results

Financial Performance

  • Average Monthly NOI:
    • Non-FIBI: $3,948.90
    • FIBI: $5,137
  • Operational Improvement: FIBI achieved a 30% NOI advantage through improved design, marketing, and revenue management.
  • Cash Flow Observations: While cash flows reflected external variables (legal settlements, financing, and one-time reimbursements), they do not alter the clear operational advantage achieved by FIBI.

Strategic Improvements Implemented

FIBI Vacation Rentals deployed a targeted $5,000 improvement plan focused on: – Interior Design: Bold accent walls, coordinated bedding, and updated furniture. – Amenities: Upgraded bathroom supplies, modern fixtures, and enhanced guest comfort items. – Outdoor Space: Added functional amenities beyond a single grill to create a more inviting communal area.

Visual Documentation

The following images showcase the updated design and guest-ready presentation of the property:

Outdoor Space

 

Interior Design

Conclusion

By narrowing our operational focus from serving two demographics (workforce housing and transient guests) to solely focusing on short-term rentals (STR), we achieved greater leverage than attempting both. This aligns with the adage, “You can half-ass two things or whole-ass one.” This is one key takeaway. Another key takeaway is The PadSplit model might have been more successful had it been the original sole focus; however, PadSplit tenants were by far the predominant archetype, as Airbnb revenue only accounted for 30% of the non-FIBI income. The property was poorly set up for STR and was only used as “filler” between longer-term PadSplit tenants. Therefore, even if we were to compare PadSplit only to Airbnb, it’s hard to imagine that the absence of Airbnb guests would have yielded more PadSplit income, as the units were often vacant and in need of a rent-paying occupant during the times they were filled with transient guests. As such, the income differential between STR and PadSplit is even more amplified given this context. Specifically, STR is a clear winner in terms of revenue and profit over PadSplit in this particular instance, given its proximity to a downtown corridor. In other parts of town, the outcome could be the reverse; it’s difficult to know for sure. However, this case study has implications for any multi-unit asset located in or close to a downtown corridor.

Share this post

Read more about other case studies

Explore more expert-backed resources for STR success. 

Multi-unit properties

How We Turned a Fading STR Into a Year-Round Earner

Trevor's STR Money Minute

Spare a minute
to make your million

We’re all about efficiency here. Our CEO shares actionable information on how to successfully identify and operate profitable STRs—all in a one-minute weekly read.

By clicking Sign Up you’re confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.

Thank you for subscribing!

We’re excited to have you! Keep an eye on your inbox for exclusive insights, updates, and tips straight from us.
Apply for a position
Ready to reimagine rentals? Join the FIBI team!

First name *
Last name *
Email *
Phone number
Position Interested in
Resume *
Maximum file size: 12 MB

I accept the Terms and Conditions of this website

Application sent! 

We received your application, and it’s lined up for review. We’ll get back to you within 3-5 business days.

Need immediate help?

You can always reach out to our support team
at admin@fibivacationrentals.com.